N.O.R.E.’s past claim about being sued over rap beef is making waves again in light of Drake’s recent legal actions.
- An old interview with N.O.R.E. has surfaced, where he vented about being sued multiple times due to rap battles.
- This revelation is sparking discussion after Drake’s move against Universal Music Group and others over a diss track.
- Drake accuses music giants of artificially boosting Kendrick Lamar’s song against him, intensifying the industry’s chaos.
- These events are reviving conversations around the murky dealings and legal challenges within the music business.
N.O.R.E., the veteran rapper, has found himself in the spotlight again thanks to a revived clip from an old interview. In this footage, he speaks candidly about his experiences of being sued thrice over rap battles, expressing his disdain for artists who resort to legal routes instead of street ways. “The streets is the streets,” he insists, lamenting the industry’s shift to courtroom confrontations.
His complaints resonated anew when Drake initiated legal proceedings against Universal Music Group, Spotify, and iHeartRadio. Drake’s legal team filed a ‘pre-action’ petition, which is not a formal lawsuit but a necessary step to uncover information before potentially filing one. Drake alleges these companies manipulated streaming numbers and used other tactics to artificially inflate the popularity of Kendrick Lamar’s diss track ‘Not Like Us’.
According to the legal documents, Universal Music Group and Spotify allegedly collaborated to create the illusion that ‘Not Like Us’ was a bigger hit than it naturally was. Moreover, the accusations extend to claims that the entities used bots and paid strategies, such as redirecting searches on platforms like Siri, to boost the track’s visibility and streams artificially.
Drake took further action by adding iHeartRadio to his list of alleged cooperators in the scheme. He even suggests the possibility of suing for defamation due to the nature of Lamar’s lyrics. This bold move underscores the ongoing tensions and competitive controversies that often play out behind the scenes in the music industry.
While the exact reasons behind N.O.R.E.’s past legal woes remain unspecified, the resurfacing of his claims alongside Drake’s current actions shines a light on the complex interactions and often aggressive maneuvering prevalent in the music scene. The connections between public personas, business interests, and legal skirmishes are as intricate as ever, making for a compelling narrative.
N.O.R.E.’s old gripes take on fresh relevance as Drake’s legal battles highlight ongoing industry tensions.
